Egypt’s NGO Laws Continue to Threaten Civil Society

The Al-Mawred Cultural Resource has shuttered some of its programs due to the recent anti-foreign financing legislation: Photo courtesy of the Al-Marwed Facebook page.
The Al-Mawred Cultural Resource has shuttered some of its programs due to the recent anti-foreign financing legislation: Photo courtesy of the Al-Marwed Facebook page.

By: Ahmed Naji

10-17-2014

In a paid advertisement published in Al-Ahram newspaper in September 2014, the Egyptian Ministry of Social Solidarity extended the deadline for NGOs to register with the government. This announcement extended the existing deadline by 45 days to mid-November; a July 2014 announcement had indicated that all NGOs must be registered with the government by September otherwise they will be subject to prosecution.

According to the 2002 civil society law (Law 2002-84), NGOs in Egypt are all subject to the supervision of the Ministry of Social Solidarity. This has created a situation in which the government monitors NGO’s activities instead of the other way around. The current civil society law is highly restrictive: It gives both the Ministry of Social Solidarity and the Ministry of Interior the authority to monitor and supervise the activities of any NGO. Their authority includes the ability to dismantle the elected board of any NGO, freeze an NGO’s assets, and revoke its license. It also gives representatives from both ministries the right to request the minutes of any NGO’s board meetings and mandates that any funding received by NGOs must first be approved the Ministry of Social Solidarity.

Currently, most human rights organizations in the country must operate as law firms or not-for-profit corporations. Under the Mubarak regime, the government allowed NGOs to operate within this legal grey area, while using the law to punish NGOs should they cross certain red lines. Even NGOs working in the realm of cultural and social development were subject to this oversight. Despite many attempts to reform the existing laws, the situation actually seems to be worsening, and there are fears that new policies will again be used to intimidate Egyptian civil society.

After the January 25 Revolution, many activists and civil society organizations demanded a new law that would maintain the freedom of Egyptian civil society. The struggle for new civil society laws continued after the June 30 Revolution, when former President Muhammed Morsi was deposed, leading to three different drafts being prepared in 2012, 2013, and 2014. However, a new civil society law has not yet been passed.

Then, in a surprise move in September 2014, the government passed an amendment to Article 78 of the Egyptian penal code, making penalties more severe against anyone who works for or receives any funds or support from local and international organizations “with the intention of committing acts harmful to national interest…or acts that breach the country’s independence, or unity, or territorial integrity, or committing attacks that disrupt public security and safety.”  Now penalties include a fine of no less than 500,000 EGP and the maximum penalty includes life imprisonment (or the death penalty if during a time of war or in support of terrorism).

This sudden introduction of new restrictions on civil society organizations has created a sense of panic among NGO workers, not only in human rights organizations but also in culture and arts organizations. For example, Al-Mawred, a cultural organization that has had a strong presence in supporting cultural activities in Egypt over the past ten years, has a program called Abbara, through which it finances five young cultural organizations. With the new civil society provisions, however, Al-Mawred has suspended all the program’s activities, and is now asking all its beneficiaries to assure their legal standing according to the Egyptian civil society law.

An unanswered question concerning the new laws is how open to interpretation they will be – experts seem to vary in their assessments. Gamal Eid, Executive Director of the Arabic Network for Human Rights, described the amendment as “an admission of the state’s desire to penalize individuals.” It “will bring darkness and silence to Egypt, heralding a phase that resembles the reigns of Saddam Hussein in Iraq and Moamar Gadhafi in Libya,” added Eid.

Similarly, Negad el-Borai, a lawyer, human rights activist, and former member of Egypt’s National Council for Human Rights, described the amendment to Article 78 as a violation of the existing penal code approved by the Supreme Constitutional Court, which states that penal codes must be articulated in a clear and specific manner, leaving no room for mystery or deception. This means that penal code provisions cannot be left open to interpretation or used for entrapment.

In contrast, Shehata Mohamed Shehata, Manager of the Arab Center for Integrity and Transparency, described the amendments as aiming to criminalize receiving money and the subsequent purchase of arms or ammunitions in support of terrorist organizations. He pointed out that these amendments do not infringe on civil society organizations or NGOs. This is also the opinion taken by Nasser Amin, who is a specialist in legal rights and President of the Arab Center for the Independence of the Judiciary and the Legal Profession. Amin stated that the law does not address civil society organizations or NGOs, which are subject to the civil society law (Law 2002-84). He added that the new provision is targeted towards terrorist organizations and individuals, with the aim of increasing their penalties.

Amidst this confusion, it seems that NGO’s employees must choose one of two evils: either be subject to monitoring and supervision by the Ministry of Interior or be open to the possibility of life in prison for receiving foreign funding. These amendments may be nominally aimed at curbing the work of organizations that address issues the government considers contentious, but they also mean that not-for-profit corporations that work in development, culture, or the arts may have no room in the new Egypt; many of these organizations depend on outside funding, which they will not be able to receive without running huge risks.

Although cloaked in the name of national security, the new provisions are nothing but a reincarnation of the old tactic of intimidating NGO workers and criminalizing their work. Many of those who work in NGOs are expecting the government to use the new law to strike out at them, but they have no idea when to expect such a move. In fact, the government may not actually end up shutting down NGOs or arresting their workers. It may instead actually use the law to fight terrorism. But the very fact that such a law exists nonetheless threatens Egyptian NGOs. Civil society laws continue to be a potential weapon in the authorities’ arsenal, which is enough to exert pressure on NGO employees. This pressure may affect the level to which they engage with rights issues and cases, which is particularly concerning given the recent increase in human rights violations by Egyptian authorities.

 

Ahmed Naji

Ahmed Naji

Novelist and journalist based in Egypt, works as an editor in the literary weekly Akhbar al-Adab.
Category: Commentary

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Latest on TIMEP

The Struggle in Egypt’s Press Syndicate

Weeks of tension between Egypt’s journalists and the state have left the Egyptian Syndicate of Journalists divided, while the Egyptian Interior Ministry came out unscathed. This marks another success in the state’s longstanding strategy of deflecting confrontation and creating internal rifts in its opponents. While the regime typically relies on the media to control the

Threats from Two Fronts: Al-Qaeda and IS Define Their Strategies

In the space of two weeks, al-Qaeda and the Islamic State released separate audio statements that merit comparison. Both statements center on Syria as the emerging nucleus of global jihad, each marking a new way its respective organization operates or sees its long-term future. Each message includes an explicit attack on the other group, a

Questioning Egypt’s Golden Era

Mohamed Hassanein Heikal’s death in February marked another loss in the ever-shrinking cast of artists, actors, writers, singers, and journalists who awaken a feeling of nostalgia for many Egyptians. The 1950s and 60s in Egypt made up a period perceived as a golden era of culture due to the vibrant mainstream Egyptian arts and media

Not Just Tech: Entrepreneurship in the Middle East

The conventional wisdom in the Middle East policy and media communities is that the promotion of entrepreneurship in the region is both wise and strategic. After all, the creation of new jobs and additional economic stakeholders creates better prospects for healthy democracy in the Arab world over the long run. Rags-to-riches stories of young Tunisians

TIMEP on Twitter

TIMEP on Facebook

Subscribe to our Mailing Lists

* indicates required